Current:Home > reviewsThis Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early -Wealth Evolution Experts
This Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early
View
Date:2025-04-25 01:35:23
Don't claim Social Security early for the wrong reasons
Many Americans fear for the future of Social Security, and this could be leading them to make some bad choices.
In fact, one recent study showed 44% of people think Social Security is going to run out of money before their retirement. This is one reason more than four in 10 people indicate they plan to claim Social Security between the ages of 62 and 65. By contrast, just 10% plan to wait until 70.
While it may seem smart to collect benefits ASAP in such a scenario, this is actually the worst possible reason to claim Social Security early. Here's why.
Making decisions related to Social Security because of a fear you won't get any benefits at all is a short-sighted choice that could cost you thousands of dollars. There are a few reasons for that.
Despite popular belief, Social Security is not in danger of running out of money. It has a steady revenue stream that comes from current workers' payroll taxes. This is not going to stop happening unless everyone in the U.S. stops working or unless the funding mechanism is changed -- which is extremely unlikely to occur.
It is true, however, that Social Security's trust fund is in danger of depletion by 2033. But if that happens, there would still be enough money coming from tax revenue to pay about 77% of the benefits promised. That's a hit, but it doesn't mean you won't get any of your retirement funds
Can I collect Social Security yet?It depends on when you were born.
Claiming Social Security early guarantees a smaller monthly check
The reality is, an early Social Security claim is going to mean you definitely get a smaller monthly benefit.
That's because you will get hit with early filing penalties if you claim before FRA. These could shrink your monthly checks by as much as 30% depending on how far ahead of schedule you start payments. And if you wait until FRA but not until age 70, you'll pass up delayed retirement credits that increase your monthly benefit up to 8% for each full year that you delay payments.
You do give up income by waiting to get benefits, but the majority of retirees are better off waiting until 70 because the larger monthly checks from claiming at that age add up to higher lifetime income from Social Security.
So, unless there are clear reasons why you want your benefits early -- such as concerns about your health or a desire to retire early that hinges on Social Security -- you should think very carefully before you make that choice. And definitely don't claim benefits prematurely out of fear of a future without them as that's unlikely to happen.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (37)
Related
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Pink's Reaction to Daughter Willow Leaving Her Tour to Pursue Theater Shows Their True Love
- Nelly Korda withdraws from London event after suffering dog bite in Seattle
- Starbucks introduces caffeinated iced drinks. Flavors include melon, tropical citrus
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Doug Burgum vetoed anti-LGBTQ measures while governor. Then he started running for president
- 'It took approximately 7-8 hours': Dublin worker captures Eras Tour setup at Aviva stadium
- Judge partially ends court oversight of migrant children, chipping away at 27-year arrangement
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- In Georgia, conservatives seek to have voters removed from rolls without official challenges
Ranking
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Elvis Presley's blue suede shoes sell at auction
- Wimbledon draw: Jannik Sinner, Carlos Alcaraz in same bracket; Iga Swiatek No. 1
- Court revives lawsuit over Detroit-area woman who was found alive in a body bag
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Rental umbrella impales Florida beachgoer's leg, fire department says
- Whose fault is inflation? Trump and Biden blame each other in heated debate
- Up to 125 Atlantic white-sided dolphins stranded in Cape Cod waters
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
25-year-old Oakland firefighter drowns at San Diego beach
'The Bear' Season 3 finale: Is masterful chef Carmy finally cooked?
While Simone Biles competes across town, Paralympic star Jessica Long rolls at swimming trials
Travis Hunter, the 2
Supreme Court rejects Trump ally Steve Bannon’s bid to delay prison sentence
BBMak Is Back Here With a Rare Update 2 Decades After Their Breakup
Film and TV crews spent $334 million in Montana during last two years, legislators told